Telephones in Italy, the Italtel Study-Case

The research is original and is based on primary sources preserved in the Italtel collection at the Isec Foundation, Sesto San Giovanni, Milan. From a methodological point of view, in addition to the analysis of sources, data and elements already consolidated in the history of design were cross-referenced (for example on designers such as Zanuso and the Castiglionis) and the relevant literature was compared, ranging from the implications with economic and contemporary history. The international diffusion of the magazine and the publication in English ensures a supranational impact. The primary objective of the narrative, which spans the 1960s and 1990s, is to verify the contribution of industrial design – through the objects it uses (telephone sets but also fittings) and in their implications of function, form and production [1] – as a lever both in the private market (which Italtel Telematica used) but also considering how, beyond the object, the investment was part of a broader strategy of expansion of the telecommunications sector in Italy. The telephone, an element of connection par excellence that accompanied the physical and immaterial transition from mechanical to electronic and digital technology, in its parallel evolution with the development of communications technology, turns out to be only a piece, albeit an emblematic one, an instrument of cultural and social representation that satisfies the functional, symbolic and communicative dictates of every era. The essay therefore proposes a reinterpretation of the encounter between a fundamental player in Italy, Italtel – formerly Sit-Siemens (IRI) – with one of the nascent forces of the 1950s, industrial design, the new discipline that, in the years of the economic boom, promised through ‘good industrial product design’ the achievement of market success. The role of design as a catalyst for innovation and as one of the main drivers of Italian innovation in the Sit-Siemen and Italtel entrepreneurial venture is thus argued.