Venice is a singular city in which its “fragile” heritage is closely linked to the complex ur- ban morphology. In the city, there are a significant number of urban obstacles – such as bridges, differences in level, narrow “calli” and unprotected canal-banks – which might hamper people with mobility problems in moving around. In this particular context, standards and rules for the “elimination of the architectural barriers” are not sufficient to respond to the demand for inclusive accessibility and, there- fore, innovative solutions are needed. In 2004, Venice city council adopted the “Plan for the Elimination of the Architectural Barriers” (PEBA) and experimented many inter- ventions in order to guarantee urban accessibility, and not only for the bridges which represent the most important limitation to pedestrian mobility. The interventions all have to combine both conservation and accessibility in order to preserve the built heritage, but not always this is possible. In fact, in the city, we can distinguish reversible interventions (such as ramps overlapping on the bridge) and trans- formative ones (such as the adaptation of the original steps of the bridge), but there are also certain mechanical systems that are now out of use. The aim of this paper is to underline the importance of the design and social actions needed in Venice to guarantee both the preservation of the built heritage and urban accessibility, and which might also represent an example for other historical contexts.

Accessibilità urbana a Venezia tra conservazione e inclusione = Urban Accessibility in Venice, between Conservation and Inclusion

Valeria Tatano
Writing – Original Draft Preparation
;
Rosaria Revellini
Writing – Original Draft Preparation
2021-01-01

Abstract

Venice is a singular city in which its “fragile” heritage is closely linked to the complex ur- ban morphology. In the city, there are a significant number of urban obstacles – such as bridges, differences in level, narrow “calli” and unprotected canal-banks – which might hamper people with mobility problems in moving around. In this particular context, standards and rules for the “elimination of the architectural barriers” are not sufficient to respond to the demand for inclusive accessibility and, there- fore, innovative solutions are needed. In 2004, Venice city council adopted the “Plan for the Elimination of the Architectural Barriers” (PEBA) and experimented many inter- ventions in order to guarantee urban accessibility, and not only for the bridges which represent the most important limitation to pedestrian mobility. The interventions all have to combine both conservation and accessibility in order to preserve the built heritage, but not always this is possible. In fact, in the city, we can distinguish reversible interventions (such as ramps overlapping on the bridge) and trans- formative ones (such as the adaptation of the original steps of the bridge), but there are also certain mechanical systems that are now out of use. The aim of this paper is to underline the importance of the design and social actions needed in Venice to guarantee both the preservation of the built heritage and urban accessibility, and which might also represent an example for other historical contexts.
2021
L’accessibilità nel patrimonio architettonico : approcci ed esperienze tra tecnologia e restauro = Accessibility in architectural heritage : Approaches and experiences between technology and restoration
2704-906X
Italiano
3
244
251
8
9788832050943
Anteferma
Conegliano, TV
ITALIA
Giornata nazionale di studi: L'accessibilità nel patrimonio architettonico: approcci ed esperienze tra tecnologia e restauro
24 gennaio 2020
Palermo
Nazionale
su invito
Comitato scientifico
Accessibilità inclusiva; patrimonio culturale; progetto; recupero
Il volume riporta i contributi raccolti da sedici sedi universitarie a partire da call lanciate nel marzo 2019 in seno alla SITdA (Società Italiana della Tecnologia dell’Architettura) e alla SIRA (Società Italiana Restauro Architettonico), sotto la responsabilità di Maria Luisa Germanà e Renata Prescia. La giornata nazionale di studi L’accessibilità nel patrimonio architettonico. Approcci ed esperienze tra tecnologia e restauro è stata tenuta il 24 gennaio 2020 presso il Dipartimento di Architettura dell’Università di Palermo. L’evento e la pubblicazione sono stati finanziati dai partecipanti, dalla SITdA e dall’Ateneo di Palermo [Voce CA.C.B. 01.03.04 Organizzazione Convegni, U.A. DA00.01.01, del B.U.A. E.C. 2019 U.A. 00.D01]. Il libro appartiene alla Collana CLUSTER AA Accessibilità Ambientale, Direttore della collana: Christina Conti (Università degli Studi di Udine) e dotato di Comitato scientifico della collana. Comitato scientifico della collana: Erminia Attaianese Università degli Studi Napoli Federico II Adolfo F. L. Baratta Università degli Studi Roma Tre Maria Antonia Barucco Università Iuav Venezia Laura Calcagnini Università degli Studi Roma Tre Massimiliano Condotta Università Iuav Venezia Daniel D’Alessandro Universidad de Morón, Buenos Aires, Argentina Michele Di Sivo Università degli Studi G.d’Annunzio Chieti Pescara Antonio Lauria Università degli Studi di Firenze Lucia Martincigh Università degli Studi Roma Tre Luca Marzi Università degli Studi di Firenze Paola Pellegrini Xi’an Jiaotong-Liverpool University, Suzhou, China Nicoletta Setola Università degli Studi di Firenze Valeria Tatano Università Iuav Venezia Dario Trabucco Università Iuav Venezia Renata Valente Università degli Studi della Campania L.Vanvitelli Contiene abstract in inglese
no
open
info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject
2
3. Contributo in atti di convegno (Proceedings)::3.1 Contributo in atti di convegno
Tatano, Valeria; Revellini, Rosaria
273
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
TatanoRevellini.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione Editoriale
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 4.96 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
4.96 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11578/298738
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact