This paper deals with the relationship between the planning process and the archaeological patrimony on a large scale, in the light of regional legislation and modifications to the statutes of the Soprintendenza dei Beni Culturali e Paesaggio. There are presented some of the experiments in the Veneto region of Wladimir Dorico, and the recent methods adopted in the planning acts in Puglia and Tuscany. In conclusion, there are presented some of the problematic issues of an institutional and methodological nature, on the role of archaeological evaluation on a wider scale in the planning process.

Pianificazione del territorio e archeologia: apprendimenti intervenuti e questioni aperte = Territorial planning and archaeology: lessons learnt and open questions

Anna Marson
2020-01-01

Abstract

This paper deals with the relationship between the planning process and the archaeological patrimony on a large scale, in the light of regional legislation and modifications to the statutes of the Soprintendenza dei Beni Culturali e Paesaggio. There are presented some of the experiments in the Veneto region of Wladimir Dorico, and the recent methods adopted in the planning acts in Puglia and Tuscany. In conclusion, there are presented some of the problematic issues of an institutional and methodological nature, on the role of archaeological evaluation on a wider scale in the planning process.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
A_RT_LXXIV_2-3_SCENARI_marson.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione Editoriale
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 591.85 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
591.85 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11578/306706
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact