In the last years, the attention to the use of eco-compatible materials and the development of sustainable solutions for structural strengthening has increased, leading to fibre-reinforced cementitious matrices (FRCM) made by natural fibres (NFRCM, de Carvalho et al. 2017). NFRCM strengthening systems, in the same manner as FRCM ones, can be considered an alternative to fibre-reinforced-polymer (FRP) reinforcement for masonry structures, to improve the compatibility of reinforcement applied to masonry substrate (di Tommaso et al. 2017). The numerical assessment of NFRCM and/or FRCM strengthened masonry is an active field of research and it represents a complex task, due to the complexity of both reinforcement and support materials, which can be considered as composite ones. In literature, some macro-models consider both masonry components (bricks and mortar) as a homogeneous continuum, and FRCM layers are considered as an additional equivalent continuum, with the textile fibres assumed as an embedded reinforcement of mortar matrix (Wang et al. 2017). These models have been extended to NFRCM (de Carvalho et al. 2019). Recently, a simplified micro-model approach was proposed for diagonally loaded masonry panels reinforced with FRCM (Murgo et al. 2021), adopting a 2D FE model with one-dimensional interfaces for masonry panels, and adding a bi-directional grid of trusses for representing the reinforcement. An updated discrete element model for simulating the in-plane behaviour of masonry walls strengthened with FRCM or NFRCM has been recently introduced by authors (Baraldi et al. 2021). This model is based on an existing discrete or rigid block model having rigid elements and nonlinear one-dimensional interfaces between them, able to represent both mortar joints and brick cracking (Baraldi et al. 2020). Such a model has been improved by considering masonry strengthened on both sides The hypothesis of perfect adhesion between the wall and reinforcement and also between the matrix and fibres of the strengthening system is assumed, in order to avoid the increase of model degrees of freedom with respect to the unreinforced masonry (URM) case. The reinforcement is modelled by means of further stiffness and strength parameters accounting for the FRCM/NFRCM geometrical and mechanical properties. The proposed model has already turned out to successfully simulate cracking both on masonry and the external reinforcing layers and it was calibrated with respect to an existing simplified numerical model (de Carvalho et al. 2019). In this work, the proposed discrete model is calibrated and compared with respect to several existing laboratory tests of in-plane loaded masonry panels reinforced with FRCM and NFRCM layers, in order to highlight its effectiveness and potential improvements.

In-plane behaviour of NFRCM-strengthened masonry modelled by means of discrete elements

Baraldi, D.
;
Boscato, G.;Cecchi, A.;Thatikonda, N. P.
2024-01-01

Abstract

In the last years, the attention to the use of eco-compatible materials and the development of sustainable solutions for structural strengthening has increased, leading to fibre-reinforced cementitious matrices (FRCM) made by natural fibres (NFRCM, de Carvalho et al. 2017). NFRCM strengthening systems, in the same manner as FRCM ones, can be considered an alternative to fibre-reinforced-polymer (FRP) reinforcement for masonry structures, to improve the compatibility of reinforcement applied to masonry substrate (di Tommaso et al. 2017). The numerical assessment of NFRCM and/or FRCM strengthened masonry is an active field of research and it represents a complex task, due to the complexity of both reinforcement and support materials, which can be considered as composite ones. In literature, some macro-models consider both masonry components (bricks and mortar) as a homogeneous continuum, and FRCM layers are considered as an additional equivalent continuum, with the textile fibres assumed as an embedded reinforcement of mortar matrix (Wang et al. 2017). These models have been extended to NFRCM (de Carvalho et al. 2019). Recently, a simplified micro-model approach was proposed for diagonally loaded masonry panels reinforced with FRCM (Murgo et al. 2021), adopting a 2D FE model with one-dimensional interfaces for masonry panels, and adding a bi-directional grid of trusses for representing the reinforcement. An updated discrete element model for simulating the in-plane behaviour of masonry walls strengthened with FRCM or NFRCM has been recently introduced by authors (Baraldi et al. 2021). This model is based on an existing discrete or rigid block model having rigid elements and nonlinear one-dimensional interfaces between them, able to represent both mortar joints and brick cracking (Baraldi et al. 2020). Such a model has been improved by considering masonry strengthened on both sides The hypothesis of perfect adhesion between the wall and reinforcement and also between the matrix and fibres of the strengthening system is assumed, in order to avoid the increase of model degrees of freedom with respect to the unreinforced masonry (URM) case. The reinforcement is modelled by means of further stiffness and strength parameters accounting for the FRCM/NFRCM geometrical and mechanical properties. The proposed model has already turned out to successfully simulate cracking both on masonry and the external reinforcing layers and it was calibrated with respect to an existing simplified numerical model (de Carvalho et al. 2019). In this work, the proposed discrete model is calibrated and compared with respect to several existing laboratory tests of in-plane loaded masonry panels reinforced with FRCM and NFRCM layers, in order to highlight its effectiveness and potential improvements.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11578/348489
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact