It is common practice in art periodical publishing to retrace one’s steps, to rethink trajectories, to revise the impact the periodical has had on art, art history, and criticism. Occasionally, going back relates to a mere sense of accomplishment: a celebration offered against the ephemeral and precarious nature of the art periodical. At other times, it has to do with memory, with the untangling of topical stories and a reminder of their influence on the contemporary art field. Ultimately, reflecting on the past is often intertwined with considerations of the future, legacy, immortality, and the enduring impact one leaves behind. Reading the anthologies and anniversary issues published by two contemporary art periodicals – October, Afterall – alongside those of Artforum, e-flux and The Exhibitionist, the article aims to understand the ways through which periodicals develop their own legacy and review their hegemonic position in Western art histories to produce more inclusive narrations.

Afterlives: On the Art Periodical’s Return through Anthologies and Special Issues

Camilla Salvaneschi
2023-01-01

Abstract

It is common practice in art periodical publishing to retrace one’s steps, to rethink trajectories, to revise the impact the periodical has had on art, art history, and criticism. Occasionally, going back relates to a mere sense of accomplishment: a celebration offered against the ephemeral and precarious nature of the art periodical. At other times, it has to do with memory, with the untangling of topical stories and a reminder of their influence on the contemporary art field. Ultimately, reflecting on the past is often intertwined with considerations of the future, legacy, immortality, and the enduring impact one leaves behind. Reading the anthologies and anniversary issues published by two contemporary art periodicals – October, Afterall – alongside those of Artforum, e-flux and The Exhibitionist, the article aims to understand the ways through which periodicals develop their own legacy and review their hegemonic position in Western art histories to produce more inclusive narrations.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
RHA16+pp.10-37.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione Editoriale
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 452.73 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
452.73 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11578/354029
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact