Contemporary societies face increasing climate, health, and humanitarian emergencies demanding rapid coordinated responses. Design plays a crucial role in immediate response, prevention and reconstruction. Yet, designers lack shared operational frameworks to translate resilience principles into practice. This study adopts a constructivist Grounded Theory approach to model how scientific knowledge and local know-how become coordinated action. Through open, axial, and selective coding plus comparative memos, we derive a five-stage process model — Know–Communicate–Decide–Act–Learn (K–C–D–A–L) — and a communication pipeline — Visibility–Comprehension–Action (V–C–A) — linking information architecture, validated symbols, and executable procedures under degraded conditions. Findings highlight the centrality of validated information design, coordinated governance, and adaptable technological and logistical solutions in accelerating decision-making and sustaining service continuity under disruption. Operational outputs — including a deployable canvas, symbol libraries, and offline-first kits — can enhance usability, inclusivity, and resilience. The contribution bridges theory and practice through an interdisciplinary framework, empowering designers and communities to act decisively in emergency contexts.

From Knowledge to Action: A Grounded Theory Framework for Design for Emergencies

Alessia Buffagni
Writing – Original Draft Preparation
;
Martina Frausin
Writing – Original Draft Preparation
;
Chiara Monaco
Formal Analysis
;
Luciano Perondi
Writing – Original Draft Preparation
2026-01-01

Abstract

Contemporary societies face increasing climate, health, and humanitarian emergencies demanding rapid coordinated responses. Design plays a crucial role in immediate response, prevention and reconstruction. Yet, designers lack shared operational frameworks to translate resilience principles into practice. This study adopts a constructivist Grounded Theory approach to model how scientific knowledge and local know-how become coordinated action. Through open, axial, and selective coding plus comparative memos, we derive a five-stage process model — Know–Communicate–Decide–Act–Learn (K–C–D–A–L) — and a communication pipeline — Visibility–Comprehension–Action (V–C–A) — linking information architecture, validated symbols, and executable procedures under degraded conditions. Findings highlight the centrality of validated information design, coordinated governance, and adaptable technological and logistical solutions in accelerating decision-making and sustaining service continuity under disruption. Operational outputs — including a deployable canvas, symbol libraries, and offline-first kits — can enhance usability, inclusivity, and resilience. The contribution bridges theory and practice through an interdisciplinary framework, empowering designers and communities to act decisively in emergency contexts.
2026
Inglese
88
Designrama
106
121
16
Internazionale
https://www.diid.it/diid/index.php/diid/article/view/buffagni-frausin-monaco-perondi
Comitato scientifico
Design for emergencies, Disasters, Grounded theory, Information design, Crisis governance
no
open
1. Contributo su Rivista::1.1 Articolo su Rivista
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
262
Buffagni, Alessia; Frausin, Martina; Monaco, Chiara; Perondi, Luciano
4
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Buffagni Frausin Monaco Perondi.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione Editoriale
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 1.02 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.02 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11578/378889
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact