This essay examines a suspended gesture in Shakespeare’s Hamlet as an early instance of the structure that Michel de Certeau calls parler angélique: an enunciation whose message coincides with the act of speaking itself. The analysis focuses on Act III, Scene 3, where Hamlet delays killing King Claudius at prayer, drawing on close textual reading of the monologue, Paul Zumthor’s theory of voice and writing, and Domenico da Piacenza’s dance treatise, which names the pause between two movements a fantasmata. Read through Agamben’s theory of gesture and J. L. Austin’s taxonomy of speech-act failures, Hamlet’s suspended action forms a distinct case: a performative that establishes its own conditions and reverses them within a single utterance. The essay situates this case alongside Richard Schechner’s concept of restored behavior, Peggy Phelan’s ontology of performance as disappearance, and the classical models of suspended action found in Orestes and Medea, framed through Walter Benjamin’s distinction between tragedy and Trauerspiel. The comparison positions Hamlet’s suspended gesture as a precursor to twentieth-century performance theory, generated by the stage itself well before its theoretical formulation.

La performance angelica. Sospensione tra voce e gesto nella tragedia

Lucamatteo Rossi
Writing – Original Draft Preparation
2026-01-01

Abstract

This essay examines a suspended gesture in Shakespeare’s Hamlet as an early instance of the structure that Michel de Certeau calls parler angélique: an enunciation whose message coincides with the act of speaking itself. The analysis focuses on Act III, Scene 3, where Hamlet delays killing King Claudius at prayer, drawing on close textual reading of the monologue, Paul Zumthor’s theory of voice and writing, and Domenico da Piacenza’s dance treatise, which names the pause between two movements a fantasmata. Read through Agamben’s theory of gesture and J. L. Austin’s taxonomy of speech-act failures, Hamlet’s suspended action forms a distinct case: a performative that establishes its own conditions and reverses them within a single utterance. The essay situates this case alongside Richard Schechner’s concept of restored behavior, Peggy Phelan’s ontology of performance as disappearance, and the classical models of suspended action found in Orestes and Medea, framed through Walter Benjamin’s distinction between tragedy and Trauerspiel. The comparison positions Hamlet’s suspended gesture as a precursor to twentieth-century performance theory, generated by the stage itself well before its theoretical formulation.
2026
Italiano
https://doi.org/10.25432/1826-901X/2026.236.0010
Esperti anonimi
Performance theory; Speech act theory; Suspended gesture; Hamlet; Parler angélique
none
1. Contributo su Rivista::1.1 Articolo su Rivista
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
262
Rossi, Lucamatteo
1
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11578/383249
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact