This essay examines a suspended gesture in Shakespeare’s Hamlet as an early instance of the structure that Michel de Certeau calls parler angélique: an enunciation whose message coincides with the act of speaking itself. The analysis focuses on Act III, Scene 3, where Hamlet delays killing King Claudius at prayer, drawing on close textual reading of the monologue, Paul Zumthor’s theory of voice and writing, and Domenico da Piacenza’s dance treatise, which names the pause between two movements a fantasmata. Read through Agamben’s theory of gesture and J. L. Austin’s taxonomy of speech-act failures, Hamlet’s suspended action forms a distinct case: a performative that establishes its own conditions and reverses them within a single utterance. The essay situates this case alongside Richard Schechner’s concept of restored behavior, Peggy Phelan’s ontology of performance as disappearance, and the classical models of suspended action found in Orestes and Medea, framed through Walter Benjamin’s distinction between tragedy and Trauerspiel. The comparison positions Hamlet’s suspended gesture as a precursor to twentieth-century performance theory, generated by the stage itself well before its theoretical formulation.
La performance angelica. Sospensione tra voce e gesto nella tragedia
Lucamatteo RossiWriting – Original Draft Preparation
2026-01-01
Abstract
This essay examines a suspended gesture in Shakespeare’s Hamlet as an early instance of the structure that Michel de Certeau calls parler angélique: an enunciation whose message coincides with the act of speaking itself. The analysis focuses on Act III, Scene 3, where Hamlet delays killing King Claudius at prayer, drawing on close textual reading of the monologue, Paul Zumthor’s theory of voice and writing, and Domenico da Piacenza’s dance treatise, which names the pause between two movements a fantasmata. Read through Agamben’s theory of gesture and J. L. Austin’s taxonomy of speech-act failures, Hamlet’s suspended action forms a distinct case: a performative that establishes its own conditions and reverses them within a single utterance. The essay situates this case alongside Richard Schechner’s concept of restored behavior, Peggy Phelan’s ontology of performance as disappearance, and the classical models of suspended action found in Orestes and Medea, framed through Walter Benjamin’s distinction between tragedy and Trauerspiel. The comparison positions Hamlet’s suspended gesture as a precursor to twentieth-century performance theory, generated by the stage itself well before its theoretical formulation.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.



