The Cartesian representation of space stands as a paradigmatic case of advanced graphicacy. It requires more than the visual decoding of lines and symbols; it calls for the development of what might be termed synsemic literacy—a capacity to interpret the spatial organization of graphic elements as a coherent and meaningful structure. This kind of literacy might be comparable in complexity and cognitive depth to verbal reading. Cartesian diagrams, through their bi- or tri-axial structures and the encoding of quantitative meaning into two-dimensional space, represent a highly conventionalized form of representation—one that diverges markedly from the spontaneous spatial intuitions typically observed in children and in cultures without formal schooling.
Toward a Progressive Model of Graphicacy. Cartesian Diagrams and the Restructuring of Cognitive Space
Luciano Perondi
;Bruno Calza;
2026-01-01
Abstract
The Cartesian representation of space stands as a paradigmatic case of advanced graphicacy. It requires more than the visual decoding of lines and symbols; it calls for the development of what might be termed synsemic literacy—a capacity to interpret the spatial organization of graphic elements as a coherent and meaningful structure. This kind of literacy might be comparable in complexity and cognitive depth to verbal reading. Cartesian diagrams, through their bi- or tri-axial structures and the encoding of quantitative meaning into two-dimensional space, represent a highly conventionalized form of representation—one that diverges markedly from the spontaneous spatial intuitions typically observed in children and in cultures without formal schooling.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
ISIAJournalOfDesign-02-Addone_Calza_Perondi.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Versione Editoriale
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
128.99 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
128.99 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.



